Comparison
Great canvases. No client memory.
Canva, Midjourney, and their peers generate striking visuals. What they don't know is your client — the guidelines, the rejected drafts, the reasons — and what they don't run is your workflow.
A beautiful one-off is not a campaign.
Design tools optimise the artefact in front of you. Agency work is a chain: a brief, options, a verdict, revisions, delivery in the format the client's production process expects — with every step accountable to someone. The picture is a fifth of the job; the platform is the rest.
- 01
Grounded in the client, not the prompt
A per-client agent draws on that client's brand guidelines and approval history — so the third draft doesn't repeat the mistake the client rejected in March.
- 02
Editable deliverables, not flattened exports
Layered graphics ship as PSD and SVG files with real text layers, decks as real PPTX, boards as sequenced storyboard PDFs — files your studio opens and finishes in its own tools.
- 03
Inside the review loop
Every visual passes the same maker/checker gate as every other deliverable — one accountable owner, on the record, before the client sees it.
| AI design tools | Tempera | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand knowledge | A style prompt you retype | The client's guidelines and verdict history, attached automatically |
| Output | Flattened image exports | Layered graphics, real decks, sequenced boards |
| Workflow | A canvas per person | Brief → options → review → delivery, with one accountable owner |
| Approval | Screenshots in a chat thread | A server-enforced review gate — with a teammate, whoever ran it can't approve it |
| Cost | A seat per designer | Billed per active client; seats free |
Keep the tools your designers love
Tempera isn't a canvas and doesn't want to be. It produces the governed, on-brand, editable starting points — and its PSDs, decks, and boards open in the tools your studio already runs. The finishing touch stays human.
- Grounded in the client, not the prompt
- Editable deliverables, not flattened exports
- Inside the review loop
Quick answers
All questions- Does Tempera replace Canva or Photoshop?
- No — it feeds them. Deliverables land as editable files (PSD, PPTX, XLSX) your designers finish in their own tools.
- Can it match our clients' brand looks?
- Each client's agent is grounded in that client's guidelines, logos, and approved work — and every rejection teaches it what off-brand looks like.
- What about image quality?
- Image generation routes to the model you choose, with budgets gated per generation — quality is a routing decision you control, not a plan tier.
- Which editable formats does it deliver?
- Layered PSD and SVG graphics, PPTX decks, formula-bearing spreadsheets, documents, social assets, and sequenced storyboards — the format follows the task, not a plan upgrade.
- Who approves a visual before the client sees it?
- On a team, a named reviewer other than the person who ran the task — the server rejects self-approval — and keeps the selected option, verdict, owner, and reason attached to the deliverable. Working solo, you record your own verdict; the separation switches on the moment a second person is active.
Comparison
Keep the tools your designers love
01
The client's guidelines and verdict history, attached automatically
02
Brief → options → review → delivery, with one accountable owner
03
Billed per active client; seats free
Tempera isn't a canvas and doesn't want to be. It produces the governed, on-brand, editable starting points — and its PSDs, decks, and boards open in the tools your studio already runs. The finishing touch stays human.
Prove it on one client
See one client move from context to approved work.
Run a real brief through Tempera in mock mode. Follow it from grounded options to a named human verdict and client-ready work.
No AI keys. No card. Nothing reaches a client without review.